My many fans, (!) will be aware of my past postings on the subject of futile tax cases concerning various foodstuffs. With this in mind, it was with great excitement that Gerry, my loyal PA burst into my room this morning and advised me that she has just heard on the radio that Marks and Spencer’s had won their teacakes tax case in the European Courts.
Now apart from the major significance of this news in the current economic climate, what is of more significance is the fact that she knew it before I did on a day when I was supposed to be attending a tax course of all things.
Mulling over this shock to the system, I realised perhaps that it is a mark of the influence that I have over other people’s lives that she shows such interest in these major tax issues (!), and no doubt, in due course, we will perhaps go out for drink together and discuss other tax cases together. Both of us no doubt can’t wait!
Trying to be serious for a moment, and for those of you who are new to all of this, the case centred on whether a teacake was a biscuit or a cake and the verdict effected the VAT position. This dispute, which had been raging for 13 years, between M&S and the tax man over whether VAT is payable on teacakes has now ended after the Revenue & Customs abandoned its last line of defence.
My issue with the whole matter of course is not whether that this was a point of law that had to be resolved, but just the fact that it takes so long and costs so much to do so. In fact, according to Deloitte the accountancy firm that represented M&S, the Revenue is potentially facing many similar claims totalling over £100m. It’s therefore no surprise that HMRC weren’t prepared to simply concede the point without a fight.
The case had been referred to the European Court of Justice twice and great legal minds had spent many hours, days, weeks and months exploring whether a teacake was in fact a cake or a biscuit. In fact, it has now been accepted that a teacake is in fact a cake which is not liable for VAT.
I suppose the conclusion I reached from all of this other than the fact that Gerry obviously has great potential in the tax world, is that so many disputes come about, because of badly drafted legislation. To distinguish for VAT between cakes and biscuits is to me just ridiculous. What can possibly be the logic between certain food stuffs being vatable and others not. Anyway I am absolutely positive we haven’t heard the last of this and I will be consulting Gerry again for her opinions in due course.
HG
You’ve piqued my curiosity.
Legally what IS the difference between a biscuit and a cake?
What about a jaffa cake. to VAT or not to VAT?
The name says cake, dimensions are biscuit-esque, but perhaps a filling and a soft (iced?) top makes it a cake.
Mollusc
We could spend all day discussing this and in fact there are earlier posts on the subject in this blog. You will also be excited to know that there have also been tax cases on whether or not a pringle is a crisp!!!
One could easily ask, “Who cares?”, but actually it is a big deal! If classification of food can save the companies £££ and cost the taxman the same.
When will it stop? There is potential for a snowball effect no?
And the taxman is eventually bound to increase taxes elsewhere to recoup losses. Dare I ask who will suffer?
You know who will suffer- we will. I say ban all taxes!!!